Comments on: Ferrari Testarossa http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ferrari-testarossa-2 Home of Lebanese Exotic Cars Sun, 04 Feb 2007 19:27:13 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 By: georgeskhai http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2911 Sun, 04 Feb 2007 19:27:13 +0000 http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/#comment-2911 @ el khoury
man the standard EVO 6 comes with 300 HP (heik betzakar)

]]> By: El khoury http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2893 Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:33:44 +0000 http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/#comment-2893 @ georgeskhai …….. i guess the EVO 6 had 280 bhp , and also the 2002 STI had 280 bhp , but you can always reach 300 bhp if you put a Chip etc…. they have similar specifications . But now the 2006 STI has 300 bhp while the EVO 9 has 286 bhp , but that’s nothing when it comes to real life, taht difference will definetly vanish in everyday driving , and i also think that the EVO is better , i heard that the STI has a bit of “understeer” on the corners while teh EVO is more presice , but after all they both give us the same feeling, the same Fun factor and the same adrenaline rush , so it all comes down to your own opinion and taste , but i Lean towards the EVO .

]]> By: georgeskhai http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2884 Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:23:11 +0000 http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/#comment-2884 @ el khoury
hey man i think that both have 300HP (for the EVO 6 and the STI of that generation) but nowaday i think that they have the same amount of HP
btw the STI got a 2.5 Liters engine and the EVO a 2 Liters engine

]]> By: georgeskhai http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2881 Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:59:56 +0000 http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/#comment-2881 7eloo ya pierre saba2etne
btw now the EVO 7 i think wont cost more than 24.000$$$$ because the EVO 10 is on the wayyyy

]]> By: El khoury http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2872 Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:31:25 +0000 http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/#comment-2872 @ Pierre …… Thanks very much for your answer , seriously.
So they are affordable (for a moment i thought that they are above 30 000$ lol) so thanks for the prices Help.
So from what you’ve said, the EVO beats the STI when it comes to performance but the STI provides better comfort and better use for everyday . mmm

My opinion is same as yours , i mean who would think about comfort when buying that kind of cars , of course the comfort is necessary for everyday use but i wouldn’t care very much about comfort while driving an EVO 7 .(though lets make it clear for everybody else , the EVO is not a pain in the ass when it comse to comfort , but as “Pierre” said , the STI is more comfortable that’s all) I guess the Recaro seats on the EVO are not as comfortable as the seats on the STI. 😀 and they both have a stiff ride .
But i thought that the STI has more horsepower (about 20 HP more than the EVO) and a little bit more Torque, but i guess in everyday use that difference vanish.

It is a hard desicion to choose between these 2 cars , but i don’t know why i always lean Towards the EVO :S …….

]]> By: Pierre http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2868 Fri, 02 Feb 2007 06:10:10 +0000 http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/#comment-2868 @ EL KHOURY… look man i asked last year about the EVO 7 bi ma3rad 3ala tari2 jdayde wa7ad mennoun keloun nwy it was about 27000 $ w ndife ktir kenit mechye about 50000 km i think (not sure) but about the WRX STI i don’t know bass akid iza bafes el model el EVO 7 aghla..
based on my informations, the EVO is always better & faster than the WRX STI & has higher performance & i asked an EVO 7 driver once about the differance between these two cars, he told me what i just said but he told me that the WRX STI is better for compfort & for the use of everyday specially on the lebanese roads…lool.
but for me i would rather prefer the EVO on THE WRX STI & i don’t care about the compfort because who wants to buy that kind of cars wouldn’t care about compfort….

]]> By: El khoury http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2863 Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:54:02 +0000 http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/#comment-2863 Guys do you know how much does a Mitsubishi Lancer EVO 7 cost ? and how much does a (2003,2004,2005) Subaru WRX STI cost ? and which one do you think is better ?
(i know these questions ^^ are not about the Tessa but i would be glad if you answer my questions above ) . (we really need a forum to discuss cars ) lol ….

]]> By: El khoury http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2859 Thu, 01 Feb 2007 13:32:15 +0000 http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/#comment-2859 But remember , it was introduced in 1986 , so it is very fast considering it’s age ! 😀

]]> By: Pierre http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2857 Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:15:02 +0000 http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/#comment-2857 BATI2A…..besba2a 3a ijrayye lol. my acceleration 0-100 km/h in just 5.0 sec :P:P

]]> By: El khoury http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2849 Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:22:32 +0000 http://www.exoleb.com/2007/01/31/ferrari-testarossa-2/#comment-2849 @ wissam …….. acceleration 0->60 mph (0->96Km/h) in 5.3 seconds .

]]>